Other than the known accuracy issues with them (certainly disappointing for HK since they've historically had a high degree of accuracy with most of their pistols), I'm curious what dislikes others have with them? I get it if some prefer hammer guns. Is it the size relative to competitors (P365)? Is it the aesthetics? Is it simply FOMO and annoyance that it's not the SFP9CC? Let's be specific.
From my standpoint, as long as it's durable and reliable, my other main concern is accuracy. Namely, how does it perform at 25yds, since that's where problem guns tend to really fall off the rails, whereas ~10-15yds can mask some accuracy issues. On another forum, several highly experienced shooters were seeing ~4-6"+ groups, whereas similar-sized competitors (P365, G43/43X, G26, etc.) with the same shooters were seeing closer to 2-3" groups.
I'm genuinely asking. When the CC9 was first released, I was excited and strongly considering switching to one for my primary carry gun. After seeing the accuracy issues, I've held off to see if it ended up simply being an initial batch with defective barrels that would be corrected, or some other issue. So far, it's looking like HK won't be doing anything to improve the accuracy situation, which is rather disappointing if true.
