Deleted

yeah, that "magazine kit" loophole was closed===== As of July 1, 2017, under SB-1446


32310.
(d) For purposes of this section, "manufacturing" includes both fabricating a magazine and assembling a magazine from a combination of parts, including, but not limited to, the body, spring, follower, and floor plate or end plate, to be a fully functioning large-capacity magazine.



now, it's up to you if you want to send that so called "kit"......but I damn sure wouldn't
 
Last edited:
Presuming large-capacity magazine body to a small-capacity state? :unsure:
We may have to delete this entire post. ;)

Tony
 
AGG said:
Presuming large-capacity magazine body to a small-capacity state? :unsure:
We may have to delete this entire post. ;)

Tony
Click to expand...


yeah, won't do a bit of good to delete this thread......you can't delete the internet;

Whatever is posted on the internet stays on the internet*

*trademark pending
 
ghoulardi said:
yeah, won't do a bit of good to delete this thread......you can't delete the internet;

Whatever is posted on the internet stays on the internet*

*trademark pending
Click to expand...

Not with our super duper scrubbing system. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Tony
 
Feel free. It's too late for me, save yourselves.
There's a black Suburban with a bunch of antennas on the roof parked in front of my house.
 
Vinz Klortho said:
Feel free. It's too late for me, save yourselves.
There's a black Suburban with a bunch of antennas on the roof parked in front of my house.
Click to expand...

That was me. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

@ghoulardi

Upon reading the Act, I interpret it as only being illegal to assemble into a functional large-capacity magazine--- not merely possessing the parts. :)
The sender has no control over what happens to the unassembled "kit", once it is received by the recipient--- like sending full auto AK trigger parts. ;)
Anyone notice who the Attorney General was at the time? :unsure:

Tony
 
Trouble is that I advertised it as a hi cap magazine, not parts. Buyer said he'd ship it back. I offered to pay for the return shipping. He was very cool about it.
 
Vinz Klortho said:
Trouble is that I advertised it as a hi cap magazine, not parts. Buyer said he'd ship it back. I offered to pay for the return shipping. He was very cool about it.
Click to expand...

Glad that it worked out. ;)
I will not return in the black SUV. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Tony
 
Vinz Klortho said:
Trouble is that I advertised it as a hi cap magazine, not parts. Buyer said he'd ship it back. I offered to pay for the return shipping. He was very cool about it.
Click to expand...

I see what you did there............you wrote that post for the benefit of the internet and for anybody reading this thread, well played...but I don't believe it will work ;)
 
Last edited:
ghoulardi said:
I see what you did there............you wrote that post for the benefit of the internet and for anybody reading this thread, well played...but I don't believe it will work ;)
Click to expand...

Negative--- just utilized my legal education and experience, including interpreting statutes and ordinances--- but because it is CA., litigation would need to be pursued. :unsure:

Tony
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top